This page describes how DreamNoos articles are produced, reviewed, and maintained. It exists for two audiences: readers who want to know what they are reading, and editors who contribute to the site.
Standards every article must meet
Each interpretation page is held to the same standards regardless of topic.
- Multiple sources. We do not paraphrase one source. Every interpretation synthesizes at least two distinct viewpoints — typically a classical reading and a modern psychological one. Where readings disagree, we say so.
- Written by a human, edited by a human. Drafts may be assisted by tools, but every published page is read end-to-end by a human editor before it leaves the staging environment.
- Cited where citation matters. Where we make a specific factual or attributional claim, we link to the supporting research article. Symbolic interpretation is not always citation-bearing, but historical claims are.
- Useful first paragraph. The opening paragraph answers the reader’s most likely question without forcing them to scroll.
What we do not publish
- Pages that are mostly synonyms of an existing canonical page. We prefer one strong page per concept.
- Articles that exist only to capture a search query.
- Content that depends on private superstition presented as universal fact.
- Anything written in a tone that flatters or spooks the reader for engagement.
Anti-thin policy
DreamNoos uses programmatic semantic hubs (themes, symbols, emotions, entities). A hub does not become public until its editorial introduction reaches the minimum depth threshold. An empty or thin hub is automatically held back from search engines and from internal tag links. The site never produces doorway pages.
Review and update cycle
Every article carries a last_reviewed date in its source. Our process:
- Initial review. Before first publication, an article is read by an editor other than its primary author. Required structural sections are checked (definition, classical interpretation, symbolic meaning, psychological perspective, contextual variations, conditions, scenarios, FAQ).
- Recurring review. Articles older than twelve months are flagged in the build audit. Editors revisit, update where new sources warrant it, and refresh the
last_reviewedfield. - Versioning. Substantial revisions increment the page’s version number. The history is visible in the source repository.
Corrections
If you find an error — factual, citational, typographical — please let us know. We update affected pages and note the change in the source history.
Use of AI tools
We treat AI assistance as we treat any other tool: useful for early drafting, never sufficient on its own. AI-assisted text is reviewed, fact-checked, and rewritten as needed before publication. Pages that read like machine output are sent back to drafting; an article must read as if a person sat down with the topic, not as if a model spoke about it.
Conflicts of interest and advertising
DreamNoos may display advertising. Advertising never influences editorial decisions. Reviewed and recommended links inside articles are editorial; they are not exchanged for payment.